Keyword Advertising Infringement: Experienced Keyword Infringement Attorneys

September 28th, 2009

Keyword Advertising Trademark Infringement Lawyers: Trademark infringement claims related to keyword advertising continue to rise, sometimes resulting in threat letters and litigation.  This a complex and emerging area of law which requires the assistance of attorneys who understand how courts apply trademark law to keyword advertising.

Our trademark lawyers have handled some of the most complex and hi-profile keyword infringement cases in the country.  Whether the issue involves Google Adwords keyword advertising or Yahoo Overture  advertising, we have the knowledge and experience necessary to:  (1) determine whether the use will likely be considered trademark infringement, (2) provide options for handling the infringement issues and (3) provide considered recommendations given your ROI and budget.

Free Consultation With an Experienced Trademark Attorney: Contact a Traverse Legal attorney today by email or by calling us directly for 24×7 assistance at 866.936.7447.

Frequently Asked Keyword Related Trademark Questions:

  1. What is keyword trademark infringement? When someone, typically a competitor, bids on trademark protected words (typically registered trademarks) a question can sometimes arise as to whether this constitutes trademark infringement under the federal Lanham Act (US trademark statute).
  2. What factors are considered in determining whether keyword advertising violates a trademark? This is an emerging area of law, and the subject of debate among trademark holder, advertisers and courts.  These matters are always fact specific which require a detailed analysis.
  3. Is there a difference in bidding on trademark keywords, and using the trademark in the advertising text? Both Google and Yahoo have different keyword advertising policies.  The Google keyword advertising policy is typically considered less protective of trademarks than Yahoo’s keyword advertising policy.  These policies are subject to change.  Trademark law looks at how the keyword is used as a keyword trigger and/or the advertising text to determine if there is infringement.  Different jurisdictions handle these issues differently.
  4. Online Trademark Infringement: The Unauthorized Use of Trademarks as Keywords for Online Advertisements
_________
GOOGLE ADWORDS TRADEMARK POLICY (updated October, 2009):
In the U.S., Google Adwords allow some ads to show with a trademark in ad text if the ad is from a reseller or from an informational site. However, if Google’s investigation finds that the advertiser is using the trademark in the ad text in a manner which is competitive, critical, or negative, Google Adwords will require the advertiser to remove the trademark and prevent them from using it in similar ad text in the future.
_________
YAHOO TRADEMARK ADVERTISING POLICY (updated October, 2009):   Advertisers sometimes bid on search terms that are the trademarks of others. For bids on search terms in Yahoo! Search Marketing’s Sponsored Search service, Yahoo! Search Marketing (formerly Overture Services, Inc.) requires advertisers to agree that their search terms, their listing titles and descriptions, and the content of their Web sites do not violate the trademark rights of others. In cases in which an advertiser has bid on a term that may be the trademark of another, Yahoo! Search Marketing allows the bids only if the advertiser presents content on its Web site that (a) refers to the trademark or its owner or related product in a permissible nominative manner without creating a likelihood of consumer confusion (for example, sale of a product bearing the trademark, or commentary, criticism or other permissible information about the trademark owner or its product) or (b) uses the term in a generic or merely descriptive manner. In addition, the advertiser’s listing should disclose the nature of the relevant content.
__________
Need Legal Assistance? Contact a Traverse Legal attorney today or call us directly for 24×7 assistance at 866.936.7447.

Purchasing a Competitor’s Trademark as a Keyword is a Use in Commerce, But is it Infringement?

March 10th, 2011

A recent keyword trademark infringement decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals once again confirms that purchasing a third party’s trademark as a keyword constitutes use in commerce.  As noted by Martin Schwimmer’s The Trademark Blog, the Ninth Circuit now joins the Second Circuit in this regard.  However, just because it constitutes a use in commerce does not mean it amounts to keyword trademark infringement.  In fact, the Network Automation v. Advanced Systems decision, which deals specifically with keyword advertising, recently reversed a lower court’s preliminary injunction against such an advertiser.  In doing so, the court appeared to modernize its view of keyword trademark infringement.  In particular, advertisers and those alleging keyword trademark infringement alike should bear in mind the following: Continue reading Purchasing a Competitor’s Trademark as a Keyword is a Use in Commerce, But is it Infringement? »

Bidding on Trademarks in Google Adwords Results in Adverse Court Decision in California

March 2nd, 2011

Update on Keyword Trademark Infringement:

In Binder v. Disability Group, Inc., Case No. CV 07—2760-GHK (C.D. Cal.), plaintiffs Harry and Charles Binder, of the law firm Binder & Binder, owns several federal trademark registrations for the name of their law firm Binder & Binder.  The defendant Disability Group, Inc., who is a direct competitor of Binder & Binder, used the keywords “Binder & Binder” in its Google keyword advertisement campaigns and the trademarked terms “Binder & Binder” as a headline in its Google keyword Adwords’ ads in order to re-direct traffic to Disability Group, Inc.’s website.

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California found defendant Disability Group, Inc. liable for keyword trademark infringement, false advertising, and unfair competition, and provided treble damages in view of the willful infringement. Continue reading Bidding on Trademarks in Google Adwords Results in Adverse Court Decision in California »

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan